![]() ![]() According to the CS Joesph grid/test, you can't be direct, initiating and movement? That is odd to me, because I have met and even lived with such people. There are some people that I attempt to type using this grid/quiz and it comes up short.įor instance, I think the system fails when you try to fit personality neatly into these boxes. It appears that most of the analysis on anything CS Joseph is about the man, his credibility, etc.but hardly about his work.Īnd for me, I have nothing against the man, but I am not sold on the system. There are some interesting and worthwhile info one can gain from his videos, but does his system work? A system that always works some way (NTs, SJs), or your intellect or any other skills to handle the situation.Īpparently SPs (not surprisingly) are the latter and NFs - due to ideological reasons I think - do the same. He always tells me when and what he does and wants to keep up some system while I just do whatever I feel like and I don't care about any rules as long as we win. When me and my ESTJ friend play online he's always the one who sets up rules which he sees as working and I'm the guy who goes rouge. NFs follow their own heartbeats and SPs test rules all the time. NTs and SJs are the most professional of all types, they all crave a system which they see as the "working model" and they trust that instead of listening to their own heartbeat. Systematic means that you follow a system that you have created for certain situations. I feel like there's some ''Trump'' strategy here: Throw so much shit at people, they won't know where to focus anymore and they'll be so caught up trying to tie up all the loose ends that at the end of the day they'll just have to take your word for it.Ĭlick to expand.Actually I think it's the most interesting one. fuck it I do my own thing and for some reason NFs identify with the latter but NTs are apparently system followers and.? You know what my head hurts.Īnd all of this is 100% accurate, non-disputable and can be done in 5 minutes based on 3 sentences someone utters. needing to validate with others, but again, it doesn't line up with J/P types in theory and I don't know why.įinally Systematic vs. J because it's essentially making judgments on your own vs. Pragmatic also sounds like another version of P vs. ISTJs for example are movement so they thrive in chaos and ESTPs are control so they need everything to be settled, like.what in the actual fuck? Someone really needs to explain this one to me.Īffiliative vs. what with Ts hating to beat around the bush and Fs not wanting to come off as too abrasive and more prone towards the passive-aggressive. Informative vs Direct sounds more like assertiveness issues or some may argue some form of T vs. Initiating and Responding are just a rehash of introverted vs. ![]() Yeah I simply cannot subscribe to that grid. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |